The Dangers of Ambushing an Ally: A Cautionary Tale ~ Some People Lie

Full Meeting between President Trump, VP Vance and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in Oval Office
A heated argument broke out between President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and Vice President JD Vance in the White House Oval Office. The confrontation occurred before a deal was supposed to be made between Ukraine and the United States in which Ukraine would give the U.S. critical minerals in exchange for some unspecified help in dealing with Russia's invasion. Trump and Vance accused Zelensky of being "disrespectful," ungrateful, and of gambling with starting a global war. Before the argument began, President Trump was asked by reporters if he would provide Ukraine with security guarantees, but he declined to affirmatively answer these questions. President Zelensky said Ukraine needed security guarantees and that a ceasefire would not be sufficient. A scheduled news conference between the two leaders was subsequently canceled after this meeting.

Russian journalist was at Trump, Zelenskyy news conference
The White House said as soon as staffers learned that a journalist from "TASS," Russia's state-owned news agency, was there he was escorted out.

Click here to read A Russian state media reporter gained entry to the Oval Office for Trump-Zelensky sit-down

Click here to read White House removes Russian state media reporter from Oval Office, official says

Click here to read Russian state-media reporter gains access, but is later removed from Trump-Zelenskiy meeting

Click here to read Maddow Aghast Russian State Media Infiltrated Trump-Zelensky Meeting

Click here to read That Time the Soviets Bugged Congress, and Other Spy Tales (2017)
Allowing a photographer from the Russian state media into the Oval Office was an act of breathtaking recklessness

Click here to read You Can't Bug the Oval Office (For Long, Anyway) (2017)
A Russian photographer in the White House has raised suspicions of surveillance. But the real issue is Trump's lack of security care.

Click here to read The Thing (listening device)

I'll just leave this here

A GOOD Google search is are narcissists mean on purpose

Yes, people with narcissistic personality disorder may be intentionally mean and manipulative. They may use intimidation, bullying, and insults to control others

Explanation
Control: Narcissists may use manipulation, gaslighting, and isolation to control their victims.
Exploitation: Narcissists may exploit others for their own gain.
Lack of empathy: Narcissists may lack empathy and feel entitled.
Superiority: Narcissists may feel superior to others and be preoccupied with admiration.
Vulnerability: Narcissists may feel threatened by people who are confident or popular.
Defense mechanism: Narcissists may use contempt as a defense mechanism to put down others.

Other traits
Other traits of narcissistic personality disorder include:

Arrogance
Preoccupation with power, beauty, or success
A sense of self-importance
Needing to be admired

Click here to read The cause of narcissistic personality disorder may be complex and linked to genetics and environment.

I suggest EVERYONE go watch UNFIT. It's a Donald Trump documentary with George Conway. It's free

Unfit (2020) | DONALD TRUMP DOCUMENTARY | Full Movie | Malcolm Nance | George Conway
Is Donald Trump fit to hold the office of President of the United States? An eye-opening analysis of Trump by leading US mental health professionals and Republican strategists, on the record for the record. Science. Truth. Duty to Warn.

US author explains Donald Trump’s Russia, KGB connections
Craig Unger is an American journalist and writer who has written two books on Donald Trump’s connections to Russia’s security services and the Russian mafia stretching all the way back to the 1980s. Unger says he is “absolutely certain” that the U.S. president is a Russian asset whose current actions are benefiting Russian President Vladimir Putin, and destroying relationships with long-time allies.

Click here to read Trump’s Defense Secretary Hegseth Orders Cyber Command to ‘Stand Down’ on All Russia Operations
Russia is not a significant cyber threat to the U.S. anymore, Trump's new Defense Secretary says.

U.S Protests ERUPT: Crowds Across America Chant Against Trump After White House Clash with Zelensky
Massive protests erupted across the United States as demonstrators rallied in support of Ukraine and voiced strong opposition to Donald Trump’s stance on the war. From Times Square to Los Angeles and Boston, crowds waved Ukrainian flags and chanted against Trump following his heated clash with Zelensky at the White House. Protesters stormed Tesla dealerships, SpaceX headquarters, and even confronted U.S. officials. Is America shifting its stance on Ukraine? What does this mean for the 2024 elections? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Why is the U.S. helping Ukraine?

Click here to read The United States, our allies, and our partners worldwide are united in support of Ukraine in response to Russia's premeditated, unprovoked, and unjustified war against Ukraine. We have not forgotten Russia's earlier aggression in eastern Ukraine and occupation following its unlawful seizure of Crimea in 2014

Click here to read Why does the US send money to other countries

Click here to read United States Foreign Aid

In the intricate web of international relations, trust and reliability are the cornerstones upon which alliances are built. Yet, the potential for betrayal or sudden shifts in policy can destabilize these alliances, leading to unforeseen consequences. A particularly poignant example of this is the danger of ambushing an ally during critical negotiations and then cutting off essential support, especially when that ally has been relying on assistance to confront an aggressive adversary, such as Russia. This scenario not only undermines the ally's efforts but also raises profound ethical and strategic concerns.

The Context of Alliances

Alliances in international politics are often forged in the crucible of shared interests, mutual threats, and collective aspirations. Countries depend on one another for military support, economic aid, and strategic guidance. When an ally, facing external aggression—like that from Russia—has relied on the support of a partner nation for years, any sudden withdrawal of that support can have catastrophic implications.

Imagine a scenario where a nation has faced the specter of Russian aggression for an extended period. In such a context, the commitment of an ally to provide financial and military aid is not just a matter of policy; it's a lifeline. The perception that this ally can depend on support fosters resilience and enables strategic planning against a common threat.

The Ambush: A Betrayal of Trust

When a partner nation ambushes an ally during a crucial meeting, it shatters the foundation of trust that is vital for any alliance. Such ambush tactics, often driven by political motivations or the influence of individuals with conflicting interests, can create an environment of suspicion and fear. In our hypothetical scenario, if the current person in charge of funds is found to be a Russian asset, the implications become even more dire.

By cutting off foreign aid in a clandestine manner, this individual not only endangers the ally but also signals to other nations that trust in the partnership is misplaced. It sows discord and fosters an environment where nations feel they cannot depend on each other in times of need. This act can alienate the ally, compelling them to seek alternative partnerships or even make desperate decisions in the face of mounting threats.

The Ethical Implications

The ethical implications of such actions are profound. When a nation ambushes an ally and then cuts off critical support, it raises questions about the moral obligations of powerful nations towards their allies. Should they not prioritize the security and stability of those who rely on them? The abandonment of an ally—especially in a moment of need—can be perceived not just as a strategic miscalculation but as a betrayal of the values that underpin democratic alliances.

Moreover, if the motivations behind this ambush stem from an individual acting as a foreign asset, it introduces an insidious layer of treachery that further complicates the moral landscape. How can nations safeguard their interests and those of their allies when internal threats are also present? The existence of a Russian asset in a position of power poses a serious challenge to national security and international trust.

Strategic Consequences

The strategic fallout from ambushing an ally and cutting off aid can be severe and far-reaching. An ally left vulnerable and unsupported may resort to desperate measures to defend itself. This could escalate conflicts, leading to wider confrontations that draw in other nations and destabilize entire regions.

Additionally, the vacuum created by a lack of support may enable adversarial nations like Russia to expand their influence and aggression. A weakened ally might struggle to defend its territory or interests, leading to further territorial encroachments by Russia or other hostile entities. This, in turn, can create a domino effect, inviting further aggression and undermining global security.

The Path Forward

To navigate these treacherous waters, nations must commit to transparency, open dialogue, and a renewed dedication to their alliances. Trust must be rebuilt through consistent and reliable support, especially in times of crisis. This is particularly important in regions where the threat of Russian aggression looms large.

Establishing robust mechanisms for oversight and accountability in foreign aid distribution is essential. Countries should work to identify and eliminate the influence of foreign assets within their ranks, ensuring that decisions made about aid are in line with national interests and the security of allied nations.

Moreover, fostering a culture of solidarity among allies can help reinforce commitments and prevent ambush tactics from taking root. This involves not only public commitments to support but also private assurances and collaborative planning to prepare for potential threats.

Conclusion

The dangers of ambushing an ally in a meeting and cutting off vital foreign aid cannot be overstated. Such actions betray trust, raise ethical questions, and can have strategic ramifications that ripple through the international community. As global tensions rise, it is imperative that nations remember the importance of solidarity and support for their allies, particularly those facing aggressive adversaries like Russia. By prioritizing transparency, trust, and mutual respect, we can forge stronger alliances that endure even in the face of adversity.

Click here to read Is Donald Trump, JD Vance and their co-horts intentionally trying to lead us to war?!?!

Martial Law
Martial law is when the military takes over civilian authority, usually during a crisis. It's used to restore order and public safety when civilian law enforcement is ineffective. How does martial law work?

The military commander has unlimited power to make and enforce laws. Civil liberties, such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, may be suspended. Martial law can last for a set amount of time or indefinitely.

When is martial law used?
In the United States, martial law has been used after disasters, riots, and civil unrest. For example, after the Great Chicago Fire in 1871, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, and the 1919 Omaha race riot. In Ukraine, martial law has been used along the Russia–Ukraine border, the Moldova–Ukraine border, and the coasts of the Black Sea and Sea of Azov.

Click here to read Who can impose martial law in the US?
The US President and US Congress can impose martial law on a national level.
In most states, the governor can impose martial law within the state.

Click here to read Martial law is the replacement of civilian government by military rule and the suspension of civilian legal processes for military powers

Did Hitler impose martial law

Yes, Adolf Hitler imposed martial law in Germany after the Reichstag fire in 1933. The Reichstag Fire Decree suspended civil liberties and allowed Hitler to rule with near absolute power.

How it happened
On February 27, 1933, the Reichstag, the German parliament, was set on fire.
Hitler blamed Communists for the arson and convinced President Paul von Hindenburg to enact the Reichstag Fire Decree.

The decree suspended freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to assemble.
It also allowed the police to arrest and imprison political opponents without charge.
The decree remained in effect until Nazi Germany was defeated in 1945.

The Enabling Act
The Reichstag Fire Decree, along with the Enabling Act, formed the legal basis for Hitler's dictatorship.
The Enabling Act gave Hitler the power to enact new laws without interference from the president or parliament.

The result
The Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act paved the way for the Nazi dictatorship that lasted until Germany's defeat in World War II.

Click here to read The Enabling Act
The Enabling Act allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament, laying the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society. The law was passed on March 23, 1933, and published the following day. Its full name was the “Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich.”

Click here to read Kremlin Says U.S. Foreign Policy Shift Aligns With Its Own Vision

Click here to read Trump Russian Asset

Click here to read Is Donald Trump a Russian asset? This US author is 'completely certain' he is

Click here to read ‘The perfect target’: Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy

Click here to read Tulsi Gabbard’s history with Russia is even more concerning than you think
One expert says her views are ‘so wildly fringe that her potential appointment as DNI is genuinely alarming’

We provide links to more information to what we're writing about unlike others. We want to provide proof. We don't expect you to believe us just because we say so. We want to provide facts and the research to back those facts. NEVER blindly trust someone, just because they say so, especially a malignant narcissistic abusing sociopath!

Click here to read Save Your Vote

Click here to read Open Secrets - Our mission is to track the flow of money in American politics and provide the data and analysis to strengthen democracy.

Click here to read All the President's Profiting

Click here to read Current Legislative Activities

Click here to read Find Bills by Subject and Policy Area

Click here to read Find Bills in legislature in my state

Click here to read Find Bills in Washington

Click here to read Find YOUR local legislator

Click here to read Find YOUR Representative

Click here to read Find your Representative

Click here to read How much do legislators make ($174,000+ per year. Are they working for you or the money?

Click here to read How much money did donald trump make as president 2017 to 2021